Elliott v. Ailsberry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the U.S. Supreme Court has held that the imposition of consecutive sentences for different offenses . . . does not violate the United States Constitution”
• “habeas relief is only available to correct violations of federal law”
• “habeas relief is only available to correct violations of federal law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).