Elliott Grisell and Lorri Grisell v. Shelly & Sands, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the “failure to understand the law by the very person charged with enforcing it is not objectively reasonable” (emphasis in original)
• explaining that “failure to under- stand the law by the very person charged with enforcing it is not objectively reasonable”
• finding that the \failure to understand the law by the very person charged with enforcing it is not objectively reasonable\ (emphasis in original)
• explaining that, for purposes of an investigatory stop, “the district court must determine whether [the officer] had reasonable suspicion of a violation, not whether there was actually a violation” (emphases added)
• agreeing with Miller, the Tenth Circuit ruled, that “failure to understand the law by the very person charged with enforcing it is not objectively reasonable”
• noting that a mistake of law is not objectively reasonable but remanding the case for a determination by the trial court as to whether the officer’s belief that the law was violated was a reasonable mistake of fact or an impermissible mistake of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).