Elliott, C., Aplt. v. Cruz, T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff who received 5 a negative performance review and was required to sign a performance improvement plan did not establish constructive discharge
• concluding that receiving a negative review and having to conform to a performance improvement plan “are not so harsh that they rise to the level of aggravating factors”
• finding that placement on a PIP and a negative performance evaluation were not sufficiently severe to constitute a hostile work environment
• finding that a “gap of approximately three months between” the protected activity and the allegedly adverse action “is sufficient to establish temporal proximity” at the motion to dismiss phase
• finding hostile-environment allegations made in conclusory fashion insufficient to withstand motion to dismiss
• Lemu alleges that his manager unleashed an “irrational defamation campaign against [him] in the presence of” a Sibley employee but does not state what his manager said

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).