Elliot W. Taylor v. Robert J. Gallagher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• nonmovant “may not create the possibility of conflicting 32 inferences through wishful thinking . . .”
• refusal to stay discovery proper where opposing party did not show how additional discovery would yield helpful facts
• \Summary judgment is inappropriate in [cases involving] negligence . . . if genuine issues of material fact exist or if reasonable jurors could draw different inferences from agreed facts.\
• “A court may grant summary judgment despite an opposing party’s claim that discovery would yield additional facts where the opposing party has not alleged specific facts that could be developed through such discovery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).