Ellington v. Peake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, when a separate rating has been assigned for a secondary disability and a notice of disagreement has not been filed, 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(a
• holding the interpretation of the contents of a claim for benefits is a factual issue
• affirming that primary and secondary service connection claims are distinct for effective-date purposes
• finding it “illogical” to award benefits on a certain date “when the evidence indicates that those conditions did not develop until some later date”
• finding the effective date provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.400 “consistent with 38 U.S.C. § 5110”
• finding the effective date provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.400 \consistent with 38 U.S.C. § 5110\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).