Ellington v. Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court initially granted § 1782 application on ex 10 parte basis, then permitted respondent to dispute applicability of § 1782 factors in motion 11 to quash
• “in the absence of opposing evidence, the proposed rates 10 are presumed reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).