Ellingson v. Sloan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where there 19 is a question as to the existence or nature of a joint venture, each case must be resolved 20 upon its own facts.”
• “By agreeing to an exchange of services for a share of the 7 profits to be derived from the joint venture, the parties provided for Sloan’s participation 8 in any losses.”
• “The term ‘losses' is not limited to 18 monetary losses, but includes time expenditures and out-of-pocket expenses, especially 19 where one party in a joint venture furnishes property and the other only services”
• “While it is often said that a joint venture is 28 merely a ‘partnership for a single transaction,’ it is more accurate to say that it is ‘usually, 1 but not necessarily, limited to a single transaction.’” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).