Skip to main content
· 1/15/1832

Ellice v. Boyer

Citations

  • 8 Wend. 503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring arbitration only for disputes “aris[ing] with regard to [the contract’s] application or interpretation” (emphasis in original)
  • “The arbitration provision in this case is . . . narrow and obviously differs from one encompassing ‘any and all employment-related disputes.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.