Ellerbusch v. Kogel
Citations
- 108 La. 51
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>The demand of the wife for alimony finds no support in law or fact.</p> <p>After two years had elapsed and no reconciliation had taken place the defendant, husband, recovered a judgment for divorce, based upon the judgment of separation from bed and board obtained by the wife. Statute 25 of 1898. Beld— that the judgment is valid and legal.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to consider whether there is a difference between Bonner Mall’s “exceptional circumstances” test and Rule 60(b)(6)’s requirement of “extraordinary circumstances”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breaux
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.