Ellen v. Brady

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• state court’s decision was not “contrary to” federal law because “[t]he state court . . . accurately stated the governing federal law”
• Rule 60(b)(6) \applies only when the reason for granting relief is not 13 covered by any of the other reasons set forth in Rule 60.\
• “An agency cannot pull a surprise switcheroo on interested 17 parties between a proposal and the issuance of a final rule.” (quotation marks 18 omitted)
• “An agency cannot pull a surprise switcheroo on interested 58 1 parties between a proposal and the issuance of a final rule.” (quotation marks 2 omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).