Skip to main content
· 12/30/2003

Ellen Storck v. City of Coral Springs

Citations

  • 354 F.3d 1307
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26415
  • 2003 WL 23024573

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If reasonable public officials could differ on the lawfulness of a defendant’s actions, the defendant is entitled to qualified immunity.”
  • “Under qualified immunity analysis, the public official must first prove that he was acting within the scope of his discretionary authority when the allegedly unconstitutional acts took place.”
  • “Under qualified immunity analysis, the public official must first prove that he was acting within the scope of his discretionary authority when the allegedly unconstitutional acts took place.”
  • “Under qualified immunity analysis, the public official must first prove that he was acting within the scope of his discretionary authority when the allegedly unconstitutional acts took place.”
  • “Under qualified immunity analysis, the public official must first prove that he was acting within the scope of his discretionary authority when the alleg- edly unconstitutional acts took place.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hull, Marcus, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.