· 12/30/2003
Ellen Storck v. City of Coral Springs
Citations
- 354 F.3d 1307
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26415
- 2003 WL 23024573
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If reasonable public officials could differ on the lawfulness of a defendant’s actions, the defendant is entitled to qualified immunity.”
- “Under qualified immunity analysis, the public official must first prove that he was acting within the scope of his discretionary authority when the allegedly unconstitutional acts took place.”
- “Under qualified immunity analysis, the public official must first prove that he was acting within the scope of his discretionary authority when the allegedly unconstitutional acts took place.”
- “Under qualified immunity analysis, the public official must first prove that he was acting within the scope of his discretionary authority when the allegedly unconstitutional acts took place.”
- “Under qualified immunity analysis, the public official must first prove that he was acting within the scope of his discretionary authority when the alleg- edly unconstitutional acts took place.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hull, Marcus, Stahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.