Skip to main content
· 7/10/1991

Ellen Schneider, Eugene Schneider, David Sleight v. Usa, Clayton K. Yeutter, Neal Sox Johnson

Citations

  • 936 F.2d 956
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14402

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the conduct alleged to have caused plaintiffs’ damages, not plaintiffs’ characterization of their claim, determined whether their claims fell within the § 2680(h) exception for misrepresentation
  • holding that the nature of the conduct alleged to have caused the plaintiff’s injury, rather than the plaintiff’s characterization of the claim, determined whether the claim fell within the FTCA’s misrepresentation exception under § 2680(h)
  • holding that the nature of the conduct alleged to have caused the plaintiff’s injury, rather than the plaintiff’s characterization of the claim, determined whether the claim fell within the FTCA’s misrepresentation exception under § 2680(h)
  • holding plaintiffs’ claims, based on the government’s misrepresentation to the private builder from whom plaintiffs bought their homes, were barred by the misrepresentation exception
  • holding the plaintiffs’ claims, based on the government’s misrepresentation to the private builder from whom plaintiffs bought their homes, were barred by the misrepresentation exception
  • holding the plaintiffs’ claims, based on the government’s misrepresentation to the private builder from whom plaintiffs bought their homes, were barred by the misrepresentation exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Coffey, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.