Skip to main content
· 5/22/2014

Ellen Robinson v. American Red Cross

Citations

  • 753 F.3d 749
  • 2014 WL 2118710
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9512
  • 122 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing under the same legal framework retaliation claims under Title VII and the ACRA
  • affirming summary judgment when plaintiff failed to show disparate treatment between similarly situated employees
  • stating second element of prima facie case in terms of whether plaintiff “was qualified” but finding that plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case because she did not meet her employer’s legitimate expectations
  • plaintiff who received complaints for unprofessional behavior and hostility toward coworkers and patients failed to meet this burden
  • “By not opposing the Red Cross motion for summary judgment on her claims that she was not promoted to the DOT Administrator and Administrative Assistant positions due to race discrimination, [Plaintiff] has waived those claims.”
  • “By not opposing the Red Cross motion for summary judgment on her claims that she was not promoted to the DOT Administrator and Administrative Assistant positions due to race discrimination, Robinson has waived those claims.” (citing Satcher, 558 F.3d at 735)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Murphy, Gruender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.