Skip to main content
· 3/9/1994

Ellen Mendes v. Medtronic, Inc.

Citations

  • 18 F.3d 13
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4153
  • 1994 WL 62870

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986)
  • regulations pertaining to labeling and good manufacturing practices for Class III devices are requirements under MDA triggering preemption
  • finding preemption where pacemaker was marketed under 510(k) prenotifieation process
  • discussing Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325 (1986)
  • discussing Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325 (1986)
  • successful implied warranty claim would supplant federal GMP

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Bownes, Cyr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.