Ellen Hunt v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a vocational expert’s testimony is not substantial evidence where the “hypothetical question does not encompass all relevant impairments”
• the ALJ may properly exclude impairments that she has properly rejected as untrue or unsubstantiated
• “A hypothetical question posed to the vocational expert is sufficient if it sets forth impairments supported by substantial evidence in the record and accepted as true by the ALJ.
• “A hypothetical question posed to the vocational expert is sufficient if it sets forth impairments supported by substantial evidence in the record and accepted as true by the ALJ.”
• “A hypothetical question posed to the vocational expert is sufficient if it sets forth impairments supported by substantial evidence in the record and accepted as true by the ALJ.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).