Skip to main content
· 5/5/2009

Ellamae Phillips Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 564 F.3d 1367
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 9454
  • 2009 WL 1193511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that if the railroad company owned only an easement, the Court must determine whether the terms of the easements are limited to use for railroad purposes, or whether the terms include use as a public recreational trail
  • referring to the Supreme Court decision, 494 U.S. 1 , 110 S.Ct. 914 , 108 L.Ed.2d 1 , as \ Preseault I \ and this court's opinion, 100 F.3d 1525 , as \ Preseault II \
  • stating that, first, the Court must determine who owned the land at issue at the time of the takings, and specifically, whether the railroad company owned the land in fee simple or held only an easement (citing Preseault v. United States, 100 F.3d 1525, 1533 (Fed. Cir. 1996
  • outlining the determinative issues for takings liability
  • outlining the determinative issues for takings liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mayer, Lourie, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.