· 3/5/2001
Ella Wade v. Lerner New York, Inc.
Citations
- 243 F.3d 319
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3333
- 80 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,454
- 85 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 399
- 2001 WL 210178
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that sentencing judge was not precluded from relying on testimony from witnesses who had impure motives, criminal histories, and a record of telling lies
- plaintiff’s age discrimination claim failed where her employer mistakenly, but honestly, believed the plaintiff had been late for work
- plaintiff’s age discrimination claim failed where her employer mistak- enly, but honestly, believed the plaintiff had been late for work
- “[W]e will not sit as a ‘superpersonnel department’ debating the merits of legitimate, non-discriminatory criteria a business chooses to employ.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.