Ella M. Beler v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 1692f 2 “does not take a state‐law dispute and move it to federal court”
• noting that plaintiff argued that description in affidavit of contracts creating debt was “not clear enough to enable an unsophisticated consumer”
• noting that plaintiff argued that description in affidavit of contracts creating debt was “not clear enough to enable an unsophisticated consumer”
• stating that if the FDCPA applies to state-court complaints, it does not require that all language in the complaint be understandable by unsophisticated consumers
• With respect to Section 1692f, “[t]he phrase ‘unfair or unconscionable’ is as vague as they come.”
• “[I]t is far from clear that the FDCPA controls the contents of pleadings in state court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).