Ell v. Ell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding judicial reformation of contract is an appropriate remedy when the contract was the product of a mutual mistake
• holding after trial that the record clearly showed parties did not become aware of the absence of a mineral reservation in a 1964 contract for deed or in a 1971 deed until 1978
• holding after trial that the record clearly showed parties did not become aware of the absence of a mineral reservation in a 1964 contract for deed or in a 1971 deed until 1978
• reformation allowed for mistake in reducing prior agreement to writing
• reformation allowed for mistake in reducing prior agreement to writing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).