Elksnis v. New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that questions not raised and properly pre- served will not be noticed on appeal
• rejecting government’s argument that the district court erred in awarding $200 in attorney fees to plaintiff where government raised argument in its response brief but failed to file cross-appeal
• “Res judicata bars subsequent litigation against federal officials sued in their official capacity when the United States has won on the same issue in a previous suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).