Elkins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellant failed to preserve a directed-verdict motion for review where the motion “failed to state with specificity what the flaws were or why certain witnesses lacked credibility”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sweet v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2011-01-27· cited 49×
• Rounsaville v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2009-10-08· cited 37×
• Williamson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2009-11-12· cited 23×
• Lockhart v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2010-06-03· cited 13×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2017-05-24· cited 6×
• Grube v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2010-04-15· cited 5×
• Jeffery D. Parnell v. State of Arkansas
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2025-09-10· cited 3×
• Cooley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2013-10-09· cited 2×
• N.L. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2017-04-12· cited 2×
• McCall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2016-06-01· cited 1×
• SAVE ENERGY REAP TAXES v. Shaw
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2008-10-09
• Quinton Earl Settles v. State of Arkansas
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2026-02-25

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pinell v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-12-08· cited 46×
• Tillman v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2005-11-17· cited 45×
• Webb v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-01-21· cited 39×
• Maxwell v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2008-05-29· cited 27×
• Bienemy v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2008-09-18· cited 11×