Elkins v. Equitable Inv. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the venue statute requires courts to focus not on the plaintiffs conduct but on the defendant’s
• noting that “[tjhese activities ... have an insubstantial connection with the kinds of events that give rise to a claim”
• rejecting the plaintiffs argument that the district where the effects are felt is valid venue
• venue of Lanham Act claim improper based solely on the location of the ultimate effect of the violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).