Skip to main content
Veterans Claims· 11/7/1995

Elkins v. Brown

Citations

  • 8 Vet. App. 391
  • 1995 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 811
  • 1995 WL 653421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “there is no new and material evidence even if all the evidence submitted since” an earlier decision were to be considered
  • holding that CUE claim could not be raised as to RO decision because service connection for psychiatric disability was subject of subsuming Board decision on direct appeal
  • CUE claim could not be raised as to RO decision because service connection for psychiatric disability was subject of subsuming BVA decision
  • CUE claim could not be raised as to RO decision because service connection for psychiatric disability was subject of subsuming BVA decision
  • § 3.302 “establishes presumptions concerning mental unsoundness as a result of the act of suicide or a bona fide attempt that negate willful misconduct ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kramer, Nebeker, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.