Elkins v. American Showa, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring a party to anticipate a specific litigation would border on requiring omniscience, and investigation materials were protected against disclosure as work product
• requiring a party to anticipate a specific litigation would border on requiring omniscience, and investigation materials were protected against disclosure as work product
• absence of \confidential” marking outweighed by evidence the information in the document \was not public knowledge”
• a party cannot establish all elements of privilege through the contested document itself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).