Elkin v. Skaggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Dimaya v. Lynch, 803 F.3d 1110, 1120 (9th Cir. 2015)
• stating “it appears that Congress intended for crimes such as conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery—which involve a substantial risk that physical would be used in the course of committing the offense—to be covered by the residual clause, not the force clause”
• none of the elements of conspiracy 14 “require the use, attempted use, or threatened use of force” and can be satisfied by a non-violent 15 overt act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).