· 10/27/2006
Elkem Metals Company v. United States
Citations
- 468 F.3d 795
- 28 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1673
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 26798
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that because an amount was properly excluded from constructed value, the issue of whether the party correctly reported that amount was moot and need not be decided
- reading a statute literally without imposing additional restrictions on an agency not found in the statute
- reading a statute literally without imposing additional restrictions on an agency not found in the statute
- “[I]t is entirely appropriate for Commerce to make an individual determination as to whether and to what extent [a value-added tax] is, given the circumstances of a particular country and company, a cost.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Mayer, Linn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.