Skip to main content
· 10/27/2006

Elkem Metals Company v. United States

Citations

  • 468 F.3d 795
  • 28 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1673
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 26798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because an amount was properly excluded from constructed value, the issue of whether the party correctly reported that amount was moot and need not be decided
  • reading a statute literally without imposing additional restrictions on an agency not found in the statute
  • reading a statute literally without imposing additional restrictions on an agency not found in the statute
  • “[I]t is entirely appropriate for Commerce to make an individual determination as to whether and to what extent [a value-added tax] is, given the circumstances of a particular country and company, a cost.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Mayer, Linn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.