Elk Run Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, because whether an “accommodation is effective or reasonable depends on the facts and circumstances of each case,” such a determination cannot be made on a motion to dismiss
• noting that “[i]n the District of Columbia, the three-year personal injury statute of limitations applies to non- employment claims of discrimination brought pursuant to the ADA”
• explaining that the reasonableness of a modification under Title III of the ADA is a fact-intensive issue that generally cannot be assessed at the motion to dismiss stage
• “By not taking his mental illness into account, and by not providing him with reasonable and appropriate accommodations during his February 2012 interrogations, Mr. Montgomery was subject to discrimination.”
• plaintiff failed to allege causation because his “complaint simply does not offer any plausible explanation for how she was treated differently on the basis of her disability” (emphasis added)
• “[T]here is no individual liability under the ADA or the Rehabilitation Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).