· 11/3/1952
Elk Refining Co. v. Daniel
Citations
- 199 F.2d 479
- 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3378
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[t]he presence or lack of a positive intention at any time is a factor of a state of mind, and a misstatement of that mental position is a false representation of an existing fact”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker, So-Per, Dobie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.