Skip to main content
· 11/3/1952

Elk Refining Co. v. Daniel

Citations

  • 199 F.2d 479
  • 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[t]he presence or lack of a positive intention at any time is a factor of a state of mind, and a misstatement of that mental position is a false representation of an existing fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker, So-Per, Dobie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.