Elizabeth E. Banks, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. The Travelers Companies, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reinstatement may not be an option due to animosity between the parties or availability of positions
• holding back pay is an award that should commence at the time of discharge from employment
• “Had [plaintiff] actually requested money damages for lost pension benefits, the district court might well have been right to deem that form of relief legal....”
• “Because front pay and reinstatement are forward‐ looking remedies, they are inappropriate where the employment term would already have ended by the time of judgment.”
• 22-year disparity in age between the plaintiff and his replacement probative of age discrimination in circumstances in which jury could have believed that the plaintiff was the better-qualified candidate
• trial court’s denial of employer’s motion to overturn jury verdict affirmed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).