Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the credible evidence standard, operating in conjunction with a belated post-deprivation process, failed to afford child care employees adequate process
• concluding that the credible evidence standard, operating in conjunction with a belated post-deprivation process, failed to afford child care employees adequate process
• holding that individuals accused of child abuse received adequate pre-listing notice where redacted case file provided them with nature of charges and details of some evidence underlying those charges
• holding that “it is not the simple existence of analogous case law that defeats the claim of qualified immunity; rather, these decisions must demonstrate that, at the time the defendants acted, it was certain that their conduct violated the law”
• holding plaintiffs “failed to receive adequate notice either of the indicated findings or of the evidence relied upon in reaching this determination.”
• noting that, based on “thin evidence, and prior to an adversarial hearing that may develop a more complete and balanced record, DCFS discloses this finding to current and prospective employers of the indicated individual”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).