Elizabeth Bess v. Check Express

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an attack on a deferred payment transaction as being illegal under state law, and thus void, is for the arbitrator, not the court
• holding that to successfully avoid arbitration a Title VII plaintiff must show a likelihood of bearing prohibitive costs
• holding that a challenge to an arbitration provision under the Small Loan Act was to the contract as a whole because the respondents challenged the \content\ and not the \existence\ of the contract
• holding that a challenge to an arbitration provision under the Small Loan Act was to the contract as a whole because the respondents challenged the \content\ and not the \existence\ of the contract
• stating that, under the holding of Prima Paint, courts may only \consider issues relating to the making and performance of the agreement to arbitrate\
• directing district court to grant motion to compel since plaintiff failed to made a record as to costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).