Elizabeth Ann Baker v. Jonathan Garrett Grace
Syllabus
This appeal arises from a post-divorce petition to modify a parenting plan, specifically the parenting schedule, and a counter-petition to modify child support. The parties were divorced in Kentucky shortly after the father was diagnosed with a mental illness in 2012. The separation agreement gave the father visitation \as agreed upon by the parties to be supervised at all times by [the father]'s parents.\ Over the next four years, the father enjoyed frequent and liberal visitation with the child. This arrangement continued until the grandparents took the father to the child's school performance. The mother believed the father's presence was \wildly inappropriate\ due to his mental health issues. She subsequently refused the grandparents' requests to see the child, effectively depriving the father of any parenting time with the child. The father then commenced this action by petitioning to modify the parenting plan so that he would have regularly scheduled parenting time that was not subject to the mother's unilateral approval. The mother opposed the father's petition and filed a counter-petition to modify his child support obligation and to award an arrearage judgment for unpaid child support. After a trial, the court found that the mother's unilateral termination of the father's visitation was a material change in circumstance and that scheduled, supervised visitation with the father was in the child's best interest. The trial court also retroactively modified the father's child support obligation and awarded an arrearage judgment of $7,000 in favor of the mother for unpaid child support. The court denied the mother's request for pre- and postjudgment interest because the mother's \own actions . . . caused a lengthy delay to the conclusion of the[] proceedings.\ The mother raises several issues on appeal. She contends the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because there was no evidence that the mother, the child, and the father lived in Tennessee for s
Judges: Judge Frank G. Clement Jr.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.