Skip to main content
· 5/16/1994

Elizabeth A. Reese v. United States

Citations

  • 24 F.3d 228
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 10793
  • 73 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2009
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10829
  • 64 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1264
  • 1994 WL 184596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that all of Sec. 104(a)'s other enumerated exemptions \encompass only the replacement of losses resulting from injury or sickness\
  • stating that “an abiding principle of federal tax law is that, absent an enumerated exception, gross income means all income from whatever source derived.”
  • stating that “an abiding principle of federal tax law is that, absent an enumerated exception, gross income means all income from whatever source derived.”
  • stating that “an abiding principle of federal tax law is that, absent an enumerated exception, gross income means all income from whatever source derived.”
  • stating that “an abiding principle of federal tax law is that, absent an enumerated exception, gross income means all income from whatever source derived.”
  • providing that \punitive damages in no way resemble a return of capital\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Rader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.