Elizabeth A. Karpel v. Inova Health System Services, T/a Inova Health System, T/a Cameron Glen Care Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered absent excep- tional circumstances
• holding that employee’s failure to raise Title VII hostile work environment claim in district court prevented consideration of claim on appeal
• finding that “[a]lthough Karpel presents little or no direct evidence of a causal connection between her protected activity and Inova’s adverse action, little is required.”
• finding that employer’s conduct would not rise to the level of outrageousness required even if plaintiff was fired out of racial animosity or retaliation
• upholding grant of summary judgment based, in part, on the employer’s assertion the employee failed to complete monthly summaries
• refusing to consider a hostile-work-environment claim presented to the district court after summary judgment had been granted for the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).