Skip to main content
· 3/1/2024

ELIUD VEGA v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding each deposit of worthless checks into account at single bank to be separate execution of single scheme
  • two deposits could each support separate charges for bank fraud “because in making each deposit Schwartz was executing his scheme to defraud”
  • each deposit of fraudulent checks into account at single bank was separate execution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.