Eliezer Areche v. Indianapolis Department Of Public Works

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing whether evidence derived from the preceding Article I, sec- tion 12, violation for legal error
• applying the Vondehn test to determine whether statements made after belated Miranda warnings should be suppressed, but applying the Jarnagin test to determine whether physical evidence obtained after belated Miranda warnings should be suppressed
• applying the Vondehn test to determine whether statements made after belated Miranda warnings should be suppressed, but applying the Jarnagin test to determine whether physical evidence obtained after belated Miranda warnings should be suppressed
• We “are bound by the trial court’s express factual findings if evidence in the record supports them.”
• “Although applying some similar factors, the analysis set forth in Jarnagin differs from the analysis in Vondehn[.]”
• “Although applying some similar factors, the analysis set forth in Jarnagin differs from the analysis in Vondehn[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).