Skip to main content
· 4/30/1984

Elias v. Zeller (In Re Zeller)

Citations

  • 38 B.R. 739
  • 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • neither absence from office, nor lack of payment to file a notice of appeal is considered excusable neglect
  • counsel unable to contact client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Volinn, Elliott and Ashland, Bankruptcy Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.