Skip to main content
· 2/23/1998

Elias v. United States (In Re Elias)

Citations

  • 218 B.R. 80
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 2483
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1719
  • 39 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 782
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 216
  • 32 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 277
  • 1998 WL 106129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rights under the Bankruptcy Code are not constitutional privileges or immunities within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment
  • “It is clear from the text that § 106(a) ‘manifests the requisite intent to abrogate.’ ”
  • debtor filed adversary proceeding to determine dischargeability of certain tax debts claimed by State of California, State asserted affirmative defense of sovereign immunity, Ninth Circuit BAP held in line with Third Circuit in Sacred Heart, that section 106(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hagan, Russell, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.