Elias Brothers Restaurants, Inc. v. Acorn Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the reliance element of the tort has been defined as requiring that it be reasonable
• noting that the reliance element of the tort has been defined as requiring that it be reasonable
• holding as a matter of law that, in reaping benefits from disputed franchise agreement for three years, defendants “have not come close to exercising ‘reasonable promptness’ in asserting their claim for rescission”
• fraud claim rejected where precise terms of contract prevented reasonable reliance on prior oral statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).