Eley v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing discretion and declining to answer propounded questions because the statement of facts accompanying the certification were not specific enough
• recognizing discretion and declining to answer propounded questions because the statement of facts accompanying the certification were not specific enough
• declining to answer questions where the stated facts are in conflict and could be a basis for the court to answer the questions in a variety of ways
• declining to answer a question certified by a U.S. district court “[b]ecause the stated facts are in conflict and could be a basis for this court to answer the certified questions in a variety of ways”
• because the stated facts were in conflict the certified question could be answered in a variety of ways
• because the stated facts were in conflict the certified question could be answered in a variety of ways

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).