Eley v. Evans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “any aggrieved party may bring an action under the FDCPA” and therefore the plaintiff who was not the consumer-debtor had standing to sue under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692d, 1692e, and 1692f
• holding that “a car dealership, and... the president and registered agent of [the dealership], are creditors of □ Johnson, and this court has previously held that creditors are not liable under the FDCPA.”
• saying a car dealership and its president were creditors at most, not debt collectors
• “[F]ederal and Virginia courts have held that Virginia does not recognize negligent supervision as a valid cause of action.”
• \[F]ederal and Virginia courts have held that Virginia does not recognize negligent supervision as a valid cause of action.\
• “[F]ederal and Virginia courts have held that Virginia does not recognize negligent supervision as a valid cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).