Elena Diadenko v. Mary Folino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that adverse actions that “follow ‘close on the heels’ of protected speech can give rise to an inference of retaliation”
• ―[I]t is not our responsibility to comb the record searching for evidence supporting the plaintiffs‘ claims.‖
• “[S]ummary judgment is the put up or shut up moment in a lawsuit, when a party must show what evidence it has that would convince a trier of fact to accept its version of the events.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).