Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc. v. Barker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding allegations of past and current infringement sufficient even though the complaint omitted the date or time of each instance of infringement
• finding allegations of past and current infringement sufficient even though the complaint omitted the date or time of each instance of infringement
• collecting cases and concluding that the meaning of “distribute” under 17 U.S.C. 106(3) is synonymous with “publication”
• “An allegation of past and continuing infringement ‘sufficiently puts defendant on notice as to which acts . . . form the basis of the [p]laintiff’s claim.’” (citation omitted)
• “ [T]he offer[| to distribute copies or phonorecords to a group of persons for purposes of further distribution, public performance, or public display,’ can violate the distribution right of Section 106(3).” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).