Skip to main content
· 7/7/1999

Electronics Store, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership

Citations

  • 732 A.2d 980
  • 127 Md. App. 385
  • 1999 Md. App. LEXIS 128

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that appellant “devotes only nine lines to [two of the counts in the brief], citing no law and only one record citation
  • noting that appellant “devotes only nine lines to [two of the counts in the brief], citing no law and only one record citation”
  • \it is not this Court's responsibility to attempt to fashion coherent legal theories to support appellant's sweeping claims\
  • an interest created by a contract is a legally protected interest
  • Unfair competition is “damaging or jeopardizing another’s business by fraud, deceit, trickery or unfair methods of any sort.” (Quoting Balt. Bedding Corp. v. Moses, 182 Md. 229, 237, 34 A.2d 338, 342 (1943)) (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • Unfair competition is “damaging or jeopardizing another’s business by fraud, deceit, trickery or unfair methods of any sort.” (Quoting Balt. Bedding Corp. v. Moses, 182 Md. 229, 237, 34 A.2d 338, 342 (1943)) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thieme, Byrnes, Adkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.