Skip to main content
· 1/5/2005

Electronics for Imaging, Inc. v. Coyle

Citations

  • 394 F.3d 1341
  • 73 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1528
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 85
  • 2005 WL 17854

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dismissal of first-filed action is improper where “the court’s decision is left to rest exclusively on the alleged anticipatory nature of [plaintiff's] suit”
  • holding that dismissal of first-filed action is improper where “the court’s decision is left to rest exclusively on the alleged anticipatory nature of [plaintiff's] suit”
  • noting that a district court may consider a party’s intent to preempt another’s infringement suit, which is “merely one factor in the analysis”
  • explaining that the first-filed rule is favored “in the absence of circumstances making it ‘unjust or inefficient’ to permit a first-filed action to proceed to judgment”
  • stating that exceptions to the first-filed rule are not rare
  • stating that exceptions to the first-filed rule are not rare

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Rader, Gajarsa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.