· 1/5/2005
Electronics for Imaging, Inc. v. Coyle
Citations
- 394 F.3d 1341
- 73 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1528
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 85
- 2005 WL 17854
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that dismissal of first-filed action is improper where “the court’s decision is left to rest exclusively on the alleged anticipatory nature of [plaintiff's] suit”
- holding that dismissal of first-filed action is improper where “the court’s decision is left to rest exclusively on the alleged anticipatory nature of [plaintiff's] suit”
- noting that a district court may consider a party’s intent to preempt another’s infringement suit, which is “merely one factor in the analysis”
- explaining that the first-filed rule is favored “in the absence of circumstances making it ‘unjust or inefficient’ to permit a first-filed action to proceed to judgment”
- stating that exceptions to the first-filed rule are not rare
- stating that exceptions to the first-filed rule are not rare
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lourie, Rader, Gajarsa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.