Skip to main content
· 2/21/1974

Electronics Corporation of America v. International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio Local 272

Citations

  • 492 F.2d 1255
  • 85 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2534
  • 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 9951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • re-submission under federal arbitration law when incorrect fact relied on by arbitrator due to lack of emphasis in parties’ presentation and lapse of time before decision
  • “[W]here the ‘fact’ under lying an arbitrator’s decision is concededly a non-fact ... the award cannot stand”
  • “[W]e think it best if on 7 remand the parties be free to proceed with a different arbitrator if they choose to do so.”
  • arbitrator was in error on an “essential fact”; there was a “gross mistake ... but for which, according to the arbitrator’s rationale, a different result would have been reached”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffin, Mc-Entee, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.