Skip to main content
· 12/8/2004

Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Department of Defense

Citations

  • 355 F. Supp. 2d 98
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24809
  • 2004 WL 2848316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that fact that a plaintiff has provided evidence “that there is some media interest in data mining as an umbrella issue does not satisfy the requirement that Plaintiff demonstrate interest in the specific subject of Plaintiffs FOIA request”
  • “Plaintiff is not required to pursue an administrative appeal before seeking judicial review of its request for expedited processing of a FOIA request.”
  • “Fatal to EPIC’s request for expedited treatment is the failure in its original FOIA to demonstrate that there is any current public interest in the specific subject of that request.” (emphasis added)
  • “The fact that Plaintiff has provided evidence that there is some media interest in . . . an umbrella issue does not satisfy the requirement that Plaintiff demonstrate interest in the specific subject of Plaintiff’s FOIA request.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kollar-Kotelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.