Skip to main content
· 2/20/1992

Electronic Design & Sales, Inc., D/B/A E.D.S., Engineering Design & Sales, Electronic Design and Sales, Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation

Citations

  • 954 F.2d 713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[P]urchaser[] . . . sophistication is important and often dispositive because ‘[s]ophisticated consumers may be expected to exercise greater care.’”
  • the mere purchase of the goods and services of both parties by the same institution does not, by itself, establish similarity of trade channels or overlap of customers
  • the mere purchase of the goods and services of both parties by the same institution does not, by itself, establish similarity of trade channels or overlap of customers
  • “[E]ven when there is an overlap in purchasing persons due to a common purchasing agent, such an agent is not necessarily a ‘relevant person’ for determining likelihood of confusion”
  • likelihood of confusion diminished where there was minimal, if any, overlap in customers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nies, Archer, Michel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.