Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. Heinemann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that litigation did not toll a nonsolicitation covenant such that trial court could only grant three-day injunction for remaining time before covenant expired
• stating that “[t]he courts should hesitate to rewrite private contracts” to toll time limits
• affirming determination of trade secret, in part, because employer’s confidentiality agreements and limited access constituted reasonable care
• expressly affirming Coffee Sys. of Atlanta on this point and rejecting invitation to overrule it
• trial court did-not abuse discretion in imposing royalty injunction because of public interest in competition, plaintiff s delays in bringing matter to resolution, and adequacy of royalty to protect parties’ respective interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).