Skip to main content
Federal Circuit· 5/14/2020

Electronic Communication v. shopperschoice.com, LLC

Citations

  • 958 F.3d 1178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that claim was directed to the abstract idea 9 of “providing advance notification of the pickup or delivery of a mobile thing”
  • commenting that claims “directed to 15 longstanding commercial practices” do not pass Alice Step One
  • “[S]ubject matter eligibility and enablement are separate inquiries, irrespective of any overlap between the two.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Electronic Communication v. shopperschoice.com, LLC

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.